http://labs.neohapsis.com/2009/05/01/the-case-for-extending-xbrl-to-encompass-a-risk-and-control-taxonomy/ Managing Risk and Security since 1998 Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:00:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://labs.neohapsis.com/2009/05/01/the-case-for-extending-xbrl-to-encompass-a-risk-and-control-taxonomy/#comment-292 Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:57:39 +0000 http://labs.neohapsis.com/?p=242#comment-292 The issue here is that XBRL is a markup language specifically for tagging financial numbers in reporting. The suggestion is not to extend XBRL to include financial risks and controls, it is to include risk and control information in the XBRL taxonomy. IT risks and controls may be included in those stated, but they themselves do not have XBRL taggs to their definitions.

]]> http://labs.neohapsis.com/2009/05/01/the-case-for-extending-xbrl-to-encompass-a-risk-and-control-taxonomy/#comment-289 Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:09:09 +0000 http://labs.neohapsis.com/?p=242#comment-289 If we are going to extend XBRL to include financial risk and control why not go the extra step and include IT risk and control.

]]>